| Author |
|
Dfresh
New Member
Joined: 28 July 2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 15
|
| Posted: 08 April 2007 at 6:18pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
Really good topic!
when to come?
highly interested!
D.
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
chriswinn
New Member
Joined: 10 April 2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1
|
| Posted: 10 April 2007 at 9:00pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
put me down for 2, please.
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Odysseas
Junior
Joined: 17 July 2006
Location: Greece
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 46
|
| Posted: 10 August 2007 at 12:09pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
Please excuse my ignorance, but could somebody explain the main advantages of the CTRL:92 vs. the xone:3D? I mean besides the advantages of course which the xone:92 has vs. the mixer part of the xone:3D
My question is mainly focused on the midi control part and not to the analogue mixer part.
Thanks in advance
Odysseas
__________________
Laptop:
| HP Pavilion dv6300 - Core 2 Duo 2 GHz - 2.0GB Ram - 160GB SATA HDD - WinXP Pro SP2 |
Audio:
| A&H xone:3D | Technics 1200mk2 | 2x Denon DN-S 1000 | Kontrol DJ | Traktor 3.2.2 | Live 6.0 |
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
rkampschoer
New Member
Joined: 20 January 2005
Location: Netherlands
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 37
|
| Posted: 14 August 2007 at 1:17pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
Hmmm, I don't think there are any midi advantages anymore towards the Xone3D.
However, please be aware that the duscussion here has started long before the Xone3D had been developed, and that there are people who might want to have a smaller (and maybe more portable) mixer then the Xone3D :)
__________________
sometimes, less is more...
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
ekwipt
New Member
Joined: 14 September 2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1
|
| Posted: 14 September 2007 at 11:11am | IP Logged
|
|
|
i'd love one, but i doubt there's much hope for it, that's why i'm buying a 92
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
phunk420
New Member
Joined: 29 March 2007
Location: Germany
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3
|
| Posted: 29 November 2007 at 10:32am | IP Logged
|
|
|
found this on the net:
click me
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
rkampschoer
New Member
Joined: 20 January 2005
Location: Netherlands
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 37
|
| Posted: 29 November 2007 at 2:41pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
As you see just below the message, this was posted in September 2004, so (unfortunately) this isn't true.
__________________
sometimes, less is more...
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Stitch
Junior
Joined: 28 November 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 59
|
| Posted: 28 November 2008 at 4:20pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
The Control 92 didn't happen past the concept stage.
I think 3D was the result.
If you want something more portable though you could go for a 1D for MIDI control only, or - if you want soundcard aswell - a Xone:2D.
I use a 2D and love it. you can use it stand alone to some extent, if you're only using a laptop and need to be portable, or you can plug the outputs up alongside any analogue mixer and get the best of both.
It's like a 3D, but better imo, if you can find a venue with a Xone:92 to plug it in to. But even plugging up to other analouge DJ mixers, with a bit of tweaking, you can still get something close to what you can do with with 3D.
Stitch
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Minasch
New Member
Joined: 05 March 2009
Location: Germany
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2
|
| Posted: 05 March 2009 at 1:29pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
Is there still no chance to get a CTRL? I can't really understand why, I'm very
shure that there would a huge demand, also if there is just one order where
everyone who want to buy one gets his chance..
greets
|
| Back to Top |
|
| |
Active Topics 
Memberlist 
Search 
Help
Register 
Login
Xone Forums : Xone:CTRL
Topic: INTERESTED?
